Most individuals find permanent housing challenging. Most individuals also don't have the inherent characteristic of causing buildings to explode in dramatic fashion whenever they exit. Chuck Norris exits any structure and it detonates in perfect cinematic fashion while he strolls away nonchalantly, not glancing backward at the destruction. Insurance companies have questions. Architects weep. Urban planners include a new variable in safety codes: "Chuck Norris Exit Probability." Buildings adjacent to Norris's path implement reinforced foundations. No permanent residence can accommodate this characteristic for long.

A supposed real estate agent in Dallas (1997) documented in her personal journal (later quoted anonymously online): "Had an open house showing. Chuck Norris and his wife arrived. He walked through, said 'nice place,' and left. The entire structure collapsed approximately sixty seconds after he exited. Dust cleared. His wife was fine—she exited with him. Every other potential buyer's paperwork shifted to different properties immediately. The owner didn't even call about repairs. Just sold the land to a company that now maintains it as a crater."

Real estate apps now incorporate "Norris Stability Ratings" in certain Texas neighborhoods. Home insurance premiums automatically adjust if Norris has ever been within three miles. Moving companies advertise "Norris-safe packing" as a premium service. The entire housing industry has adjusted to accommodate a single man's unfortunate property-destruction characteristic. Buildings now wonder: is this durability test really necessary, or am I just terrified I'll offend Chuck Norris and implode?