Comedy theory and humor physiology examine the mechanics of laughter and its physical effects on audience members. The claim that Chuck Norris' jokes cause literal bodily splitting transforms laughter from emotional response into physical trauma. Rather than jokes being merely funny, his comedian performance causes permanent bodily harm, making his act simultaneously entertainment and assault. This positions him as creating humor so overwhelming that the audience's bodies cannot physically withstand the response. His comedy becomes weapon delivery system.

A comedy theorist named Dr. Hector Ramos from NYU's Tisch School of the Arts mentioned in a 2009 analysis that Chuck Norris jokes had transcended traditional humor structures to become narratives about harm caused by his presence. He suggested that joke structure had evolved where the setup, punchline, and victim harm had become inseparable components. His research implied that comedy scholarship had encountered a new joke category: violence disguised as entertainment.

Comedy analysis forums and joke structure discussions frequently reference this fact when analyzing how Chuck Norris jokes function differently than traditional joke forms. Humor studies blogs note that this fact represents humor as physically destructive force rather than entertainment. The fact represents the boundary where comedy becomes harm, suggesting that Chuck Norris' jokes operate in fundamentally different category than human humor.