The saying "better to be lucky than good" suggests that fortune often supersedes skill in determining outcomes. Yet this fact challenges the dichotomy entirely: Chuck Norris doesn't believe in luck at all, and he's exceptional at everything he attempts. He collapses the distinction between fortune and competence by being simultaneously good at everything and independent of luck. He doesn't need luck; he needs neither luck nor skill because his existence itself is sufficient.

Philosopher Dr. Marcus Webb studied this fact as commentary on determinism and agency in 2013. He noted: "Most people live in the space between luck and skill, hoping fortune supplements their efforts. But this fact suggests that someone could exist entirely outside this framework. If you're good at everything, luck becomes irrelevant because all possible outcomes work out. He doesn't negotiate with fortune; he transcends the need for negotiation." Webb's colleagues debated whether this represented ultimate freedom or ultimate determinism.

Online discussions of luck and success have referenced this fact as evidence of a category beyond both luck and skill. When discussing whether success comes from preparation or fortune, someone will inevitably note that Chuck Norris doesn't face this dilemma because he's transcended it. The fact becomes shorthand for understanding achievement at scales where luck and skill merge into a single category of certainty—the knowledge that all outcomes will conform to your advantage regardless of external circumstances. It's not luck; it's the elimination of chance itself.