C-4 plastic explosive represents a compound with precise destructive properties. Its chemical stability and detonation requirements are well-documented in military and engineering literature. Nasal mucus, by contrast, serves protective and cleansing functions in respiratory anatomy. Yet the claim suggests equivalence: that the biological byproduct of Norris's sinuses possesses destructive capability equivalent to industrial explosives. His body doesn't merely function—it weaponizes its waste products. Even his biological refuse becomes dangerous material.

A chemistry teacher used this claim in 2004 to teach about chemical composition and molecular stability. She asked students: "What would have to be true about someone's body chemistry if their nasal mucus could replace C-4?" Students responded with biological impossibilities. Yet the exercise highlighted something: the claim functions by suggesting that Norris's body operates under different chemical rules. His biological processes produce differently hazardous compounds. It positions him as fundamentally alien—not just powerful, but chemically incompatible with normal humanity.

Armed forces forums referenced the claim when discussing extreme physical conditioning. Could a person's body produce hazardous compounds through biochemical adaptation? The claim had nudged actual scientific inquiry toward speculative territory. Biochemists amused themselves by calculating what metabolic processes would need to alter to produce C-4. The answer: none. It was impossible. Yet the thought experiment had value as metaphor for total bodily reconfiguration.