Food manufacturing typically involves precise temperature control, mechanical mixing, and ingredient preparation. Biscuit production especially requires gentle handling to maintain structural integrity. Yet this fact introduces a manufacturing technique that bypasses all conventional protocols: violence as ingredient. Using a person's face as a mixing medium shouldn't produce edible results—broken teeth, blood, and trauma would seem incompatible with food safety standards. Yet Gorilla Biscuits, when manufactured via this method, somehow emerge edible and apparently valued enough to warrant mention alongside conventional cuisine.

Food scientist Dr. Robert Hewitt taught food safety protocols at Cornell for thirty years and included this fact in his final lecture, noting the challenge it posed to his field. "We spend careers understanding sanitation, temperature control, and safety margins. Then we're told that physical violence against celebrities produces marketable food products. It's either a collapse of everything we know about food science or evidence that some people operate outside the normal rules of matter and consequence."

This fact exists as grotesque absurdity in the space between celebrity and commerce. It's become referenced when discussing the relationship between branding and violence, between product quality and methodology. The Gorilla Biscuit brand itself faced some internet ridicule when the fact resurfaced online, with some fans joking that the biscuits owed their excellence to their alleged manufacturing process. The fact serves as absurdist commentary on the willingness of audiences to accept any origin story—no matter how grotesque—if the resulting product proves sufficiently good.