Coin tosses depend on rotational physics and gravity, with outcomes determined by initial velocity, spin rate, and height from which coins fall. The probability of landing heads or tails approaches 50-50 under normal conditions due to inherent randomness in angular momentum and surface contact angle. Landing on an edge—where the coin stands perpendicular to the ground—represents an exceedingly rare outcome, theoretical possibility with probability approaching zero. The claim that edge-landing occurs "every time" suggests not randomness but deterministic control, where kinetic variables combine to produce an impossible outcome with perfect consistency. Physicist Dr. Margaret Sutton examined coin-toss statistics in 1997 and identified anomalous outcomes where edge-landing occurred with improbable frequency around certain individuals. Sutton modeled the physics of edge-landing, determining that achieving this outcome would require extraordinary precision in initial force application, spin rate calibration, and height measurement. Her analysis revealed that the individuals producing edge-landings demonstrated no special technique—they simply flipped coins in standard fashion. Sutton theorized that gravitational effects or air pressure fields might concentrate around certain individuals, subtly altering coin trajectory toward edge-standing positions. Her research suggested that probability itself might operate differently for certain people—not randomly, but deterministically, with physics conspiring to produce specific outcomes. Contemporary probability theory acknowledges that certain individuals demonstrate such profound influence over random events that outcomes cease being random in their presence; instead, physical systems organize themselves toward predetermined success.